The rate adjustment that never came.
The apprentice rate went up on 1 March. The payslip didn't follow.
PayTjek checks every line of the payslip against the Danish collective agreement and the law, and shows the clause, the quote and the amount in kroner. Before pay goes out, or retrospectively in a member case.

//Find the errors
Synthetic payslip: an apprentice on step 2 in Industry, March 2026. Over 18 and under 25, more than 2 months' seniority.
//Solutions
One rules engine. The same rules and the same answer – whoever is asking.
//See the platform
See the whole case in 73 seconds, from new case to the letter to the employer, recorded in the Consultant Tool. The check itself takes about 75 seconds: about 3 seconds per payslip. With Danish subtitles.
The apprentice rate went up on 1 March. The payslip didn't follow.
DKK 31.05 should have been DKK 32.15 from 1 March 2026.
The supplement was calculated at the old percentage. It should have been 32% (§ 12(3) of the working hours agreement).
The rate went up to 11% on 1 May 2025. The payslip didn't follow (collective agreement § 5(1)(B)).
Free choice account after 1 March 2026.
Five evening hours fell outside the supplement because it started an hour too late (agreement 79.01, § 13(2)).
The rate went up to 6.5% on 1 May 2024. The payslip didn't follow (collective agreement § 8(1)).
60 hours paid in a month with standard hours of 170. If the apprentice was at school, just over DKK 10,000 is missing.
None of them is spectacular. That's why they're allowed to stay.
//What an answer looks like
For arbejde inden for normal effektiv ugentlig arbejdstid på 37 timer betales følgende tillæg pr. time: (In English: for work within the normal effective weekly working hours of 37 hours, the following supplement is paid per hour.) Table cell: weekdays 18.00-23.00, 1 March 2026, DKK 32.15.Same payslip, same answer. Today and a year from now.
AI reads the collective agreement. Maths calculates the pay. Every krone has a clause.
The line matches, to the last øre.
GreenAn error, with the amount in kroner and the clause.
RedSomething a specialist should look at.
YellowWe're missing one document, and we say which.
BlueThe rule isn't in our rule set yet, and we say so.
GreyThe line isn't covered by the collective agreement.
GreyNo line is hidden. Every line is either checked, or it says what we're missing.
//The whole case
Upload two years of payslips at once. PayTjek follows the case month by month: step changes, rate adjustments, new agreement periods and year-to-date balances. Out comes one combined claim.
Only one error in four can be seen on the payslip alone. More than half require the collective agreement, the law or the contract, and almost one in five requires the previous payslip.
//Why not just use ChatGPT?
Click the documents in, one at a time. See what the model has to keep track of, what it costs, and how long you wait before it can answer a single question.
The case documents
ChatGPT or Claude
0 tokens1M = Claude's limit
Sources, checked 16 October 2026: ChatGPT plans · ChatGPT and files · Claude's context · Claude's file limits · OpenAI pricing · Anthropic pricing · NoLiMa · Lost in the Middle. Tokens are measured with OpenAI's tokenizer.
PayTjek reads the collective agreement once and stores every rule with its source. Each payslip is checked only against the rules that applied on that date, and personal data is removed before the payslip is read. A case with 25 payslips is checked in about 75 seconds, and that is the whole case, not one answer. The same case gives the same answer, every time, with the clause.
Is your collective agreement missing? We'll build it for your pilot.
//Trust
Supported by Innovation Fund Denmark//Why we're building it
"The collective agreement takes months to negotiate. But no one can prove it is being followed. We're changing that."

Send us the collective agreement, the local agreements and a case in advance. Book 30 minutes. We'll run your own payslip through while you watch.